<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Apple Ipad, a Disruptive Innovation</title> <atom:link href="http://jeffmcneill.com/apple-ipad-disruptive-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://jeffmcneill.com/apple-ipad-disruptive-innovation/</link> <description>Publishing, Internet Marketing from Chiang Mai, Thailand</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jeffmcneill</title><link>http://jeffmcneill.com/apple-ipad-disruptive-innovation/#comment-103</link> <dc:creator>jeffmcneill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://jeffmcneill.com/?p=2417#comment-103</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments David. I think comparing this with other technologies usually comes up with an undervaluation. For example, you can have ebooks on a laptop computer (but not very well on a mobile device). But Netbooks really took off based pretty much only on a size/weight difference. We see a proliferation of device sizes and interaction styles. This is the history of technology, that new modes and forms of interaction burgeon. The iPad is neither a mobile device, nor is it a tablet computer. It is in between and as a media-rich device and the same price point as the Kindle (which has consistently sold out for the past two years) the market demand will be there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another gigantic market for this will be business followed by gaming. The third is education. My sales manager wants one of these immediately. Her option is lugging around a netbook, or trying to do data entry, customer information lookup, etc. on a tiny Iphone screen. This new Ipad will be a salesperson&#039;s best friend. I will buy one for her as soon as they are available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to note that I have still not (yet) bought an Iphone. I waited and got a Nokia N82, because of the size, 5mp camera (which no competitor could beat for 18 months) and the S60 Symbian operating system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After 3 years (and sales of 75 million Iphone and Ipod Touches), I am very close to buying. In addition I see the Droid as being very interesting as well. However, for the Ipad I want one immediately. This is also because I have been holding off on getting a Kindle DX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For developers, the Ipad will offer a computing environment that will be different from the Iphone. A 9.7&quot; screen is dramatically different from a 3.5&quot; screen. The applications we are designing for the Ipad at Lanna Innovation will include many of the interactions which makes sense only at this size form factor (1024x768).&lt;/p&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments David. I think comparing this with other technologies usually comes up with an undervaluation. For example, you can have ebooks on a laptop computer (but not very well on a mobile device). But Netbooks really took off based pretty much only on a size/weight difference. We see a proliferation of device sizes and interaction styles. This is the history of technology, that new modes and forms of interaction burgeon. The iPad is neither a mobile device, nor is it a tablet computer. It is in between and as a media-rich device and the same price point as the Kindle (which has consistently sold out for the past two years) the market demand will be there.</p><p>Another gigantic market for this will be business followed by gaming. The third is education. My sales manager wants one of these immediately. Her option is lugging around a netbook, or trying to do data entry, customer information lookup, etc. on a tiny Iphone screen. This new Ipad will be a salesperson&#8217;s best friend. I will buy one for her as soon as they are available.</p><p>I want to note that I have still not (yet) bought an Iphone. I waited and got a Nokia N82, because of the size, 5mp camera (which no competitor could beat for 18 months) and the S60 Symbian operating system.</p><p>After 3 years (and sales of 75 million Iphone and Ipod Touches), I am very close to buying. In addition I see the Droid as being very interesting as well. However, for the Ipad I want one immediately. This is also because I have been holding off on getting a Kindle DX.</p><p>For developers, the Ipad will offer a computing environment that will be different from the Iphone. A 9.7&#8243; screen is dramatically different from a 3.5&#8243; screen. The applications we are designing for the Ipad at Lanna Innovation will include many of the interactions which makes sense only at this size form factor (1024&#215;768).</p>]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Onoue</title><link>http://jeffmcneill.com/apple-ipad-disruptive-innovation/#comment-102</link> <dc:creator>David Onoue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://jeffmcneill.com/?p=2417#comment-102</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;True that the innovation is in the interaction but isn&#039;t that where apple always comes up with their innovations?  They never create something that is brand new.... They take existing technologies and enhance the user interaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I honestly don&#039;t think this will be as disruptive as the iPhone.  I see this as perfect for someone who loves playing apps on their iPhone or iTouch, but the lack of flash support, multi-tasking, and camera for chatting might cause some hesitation at least on my part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know if you noticed but there wasn&#039;t as much oohhs and aahhs during Jobs&#039; speech (which doesn&#039;t happen that often) was an indication (to me) that this isn&#039;t going to be like the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll wait for the second generation to see if I&#039;ll actually buy one.&lt;/p&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that the innovation is in the interaction but isn&#8217;t that where apple always comes up with their innovations?  They never create something that is brand new&#8230;. They take existing technologies and enhance the user interaction.</p><p>I honestly don&#8217;t think this will be as disruptive as the iPhone.  I see this as perfect for someone who loves playing apps on their iPhone or iTouch, but the lack of flash support, multi-tasking, and camera for chatting might cause some hesitation at least on my part.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know if you noticed but there wasn&#8217;t as much oohhs and aahhs during Jobs&#8217; speech (which doesn&#8217;t happen that often) was an indication (to me) that this isn&#8217;t going to be like the iPhone.</p><p>I&#8217;ll wait for the second generation to see if I&#8217;ll actually buy one.</p>]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
