The Art of Pricing - Three Simple Strategies

There is a long and storied history regarding pricing of goods and services. Wikipedia has a nice overview article with linked sub-articles.

Simplicity - The Rule of Three

Complexity is managed easiest with simplicity. In this case all the various Pricing “strategies” can be summed under three specific uses of pricing:

Electronic Price Tags

Pricing is Psychology

One key thing to remember is that pricing is all about psychology. It is true that some so-called rational strategies (such as cost + plus) are based on non-psychological elements, but that is simply another approach to justify or legitimate a particular price. We have learned from Goldratt that that is a fundamentally flawed approach. All pricing communicates value, it is to whom and what is of value that are the two components of a strategy.

Pricing as Competitive Weapon

This approach usually means aggressive pricing (usually undercutting the competitors in a given market) to reduce the profitability in a market and make it less attractive. Combined with an already-established brand name, and a highly profitable segment, this can be an effective weapon to attack rivals and gain market share.

Pricing as a Product Attribute

Usually only a single competitor can be successful with this approach and two equally matched competitors will simply bleed each other (remember the cola wars). The best approach to counter this is a differentiated offering which cannot be overcome by lower pricing alone. (This is nothing more than elementary Porter.)

And so here we communicate to rivals about the value of the market segment, as well as the defensibility of the segment.

Pricing as a Product Attribute

This strategy communicates to customers the value of the product.

A high-quality product or service without a commensurate high price is only confusing to the customer and makes them doubt the quality of the offering. The terms affordable, reasonably-priced, competitively-priced all really mean low quality and not “justifiable price” which is what some companies want to communicate.

The best thing is to abandon trying to justify price based on anything other than the perceived value to the customer. This means that a high degree of utility of the product or service and a high or medium-high price should be the focus. There are other ways of reducing the cost of the offering so that a given segment remains profitable. Kim and Mauborgne are most instructive in terms of cost and pricing strategies.

Pricing as a Market Segmentation Tool

A fundamental understanding of a market is that there are various levels of price sensitivity and desirable product attributes. The idea is that a diversity of offerings are used in order to capture the maximum profits of each market segment.

Pricing as Market Segmentation

Offer two products or services at different prices, and everyone’s needs are met at prices they are willing to pay.

Airlines are a visible model of segmentation. More legroom and better service enable a higher price for the same transportation service. Price differentiation based on when to buy tickets perform the same function, enabling greater profits.

Questions

Here are some questions based on these three simple strategies:

Popularity: 100% [?]

July 5, 2009 • Tags: , , • Posted in: marketing, strategy • No Comments

Wordpress upgrade, theme refresh, list of plugins

Just upgraded to WP 2.7.1. There were a few fun moments.

Wordpress.org

The Upgrade

It should have gone like this

$ svn sw http://core.svn.wordpress.org/tags/2.7.1/ .

but instead it went like this

$ rm -rf *.*
$ svn co http://core.svn.wordpress.org/tags/2.7.1/ .

New Theme

Also installed the Grey Matter theme. Did some hackery on a few items, but really tasteful right out-of-the-box. Hope you like it.

Wordpress Plugins

My WP plugins look something like this (not 100% accurate, but maybe 90%)

Activated

Deactivated

Popularity: 33% [?]

July 5, 2009 • Tags: , , • Posted in: marketing, strategy • No Comments

What is the Meaning of your Brand?

I highly recommend the book Making Meaning by Diller, Shedroff & Rhea (2006). The material is well researched and built from significant insight and a good deal of hard data. The core question of the book is what meaning is being produced through interaction with a brand.

From this perspective, the production of meaning can be understood as a key or even primary goal of the brand interaction.

Of course meanings can be significantly culturally-bound. However, they identify a number of meanings which appear to be cross-cultural. Not meant to be an exhausting list, it is nonetheless interesting.

Which one of these meanings could be considered vitally important and even understood as the primary goal of your brand?

Popularity: 25% [?]

July 2, 2009 • Tags: , • Posted in: brand • No Comments